Other Resources

2025
[Various entries: Ambivalence; Ambiguity; Arena; Communication; Controversy; Public opinion; Resonance]
Baden, C. (2025). [Various entries: Ambivalence; Ambiguity; Arena; Communication; Controversy; Public opinion; Resonance]. G. Szabó, C. Cunha, J. Ruzaitė, & T. Kunić (Ed.), OPINION Glossary: Integrating theory and methods for automatically analyzing opinionated communication. Publisher's VersionAbstract

One of the goals of the WG1 (THEORY) of the COST Action OPINION was an extensive literature review of existing theory and research on opinions and their textual/discursive expression that would allow us to develop a glossary of key definitions and terms. We aim in offering an interdisciplinary, still coherent, overview of key terms and definitions to scholars who have been conducting studies on opinion or are planning to start doing that.

This Glossary is an outcome of collaborative work of more than 30 scholars from 13 countries and regions. For the previous months, participants of the WG1 have been working in four subgroups, arranged around four areas of study, namely: (1) linguistics, (2) political communication & cultural studies, (3) public opinion, and (4) communication & media studies. Based on the Literature Review, we recognised terms and concepts employed in studies on opinionated communication across disciplines.

Both the Literature Review and the Glossary will serve us as a starting point for developing a joint manifesto on conceptual criteria and dimensions of textually expressed opinions and resulting research agenda (MoU, D1.2).

The Glossary contains over 140 entries, each providing a clear definition, highlighting the main features of the concept or phenomenon, and outlining its theoretical background. Each entry concludes with a selection of references for further reading. All entries have been peer-reviewed and edited into a standardised format.

We hope this Glossary will serve as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners alike, fostering a shared understanding of key concepts and facilitating interdisciplinary dialogue on the study of opinions. By clarifying definitions and theoretical foundations, we aim to contribute to more rigorous, transparent, and collaborative research in the fields of linguistics, communication, and social sciences. We warmly thank all contributors and reviewers for their dedication to this collective effort.

2021
PROFECI codebook: Israeli elections 2019-2021 & US elections 2016/2020
Tenenboim Weinblatt, K., Baden, C., Aharoni, T., Overbeck, M., & Amit-Danhi, E. R. (2021). PROFECI codebook: Israeli elections 2019-2021 & US elections 2016/2020. PROFECI Working Paper , 2021 (2). Publisher's Version
PROFECI Panel Survey: The Israeli General Elections 2019-2021
Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K., Baden, C., Aharoni, T., & Overbeck, M. (2021). PROFECI Panel Survey: The Israeli General Elections 2019-2021. PROFECI Working Paper , 2021 (1). Publisher's Version
2018
The INFOCORE Dictionary. A multilingual dictionary for automatically analyzing conflict-related discourse
Baden, C., Jungblut, M., Micevski, I., Stalpouskaya, K., Tenenboim Weinblatt, K., Berganza Conde, R., Dimitrakopoulou, D., et al. (2018). The INFOCORE Dictionary. A multilingual dictionary for automatically analyzing conflict-related discourse. Publisher's VersionAbstract

This dictionary was created as part of the INFOCORE research project, coordinated by Romy Fröhlich, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich;

as part of the work of the Methodological Working Group: Content Analysis, headed by Christian Baden, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem;

which was a joint effort of Work Package 5: Social Media, headed by Dimitra Dimitrakopoulou, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Work Package 6: Strategic Communication, headed by Romy Fröhlich, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich; Work Package 7: Journalistic Transformation, headed by Keren Tenenboim-Weinblatt, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem; and Work Package 8: Parliamentary Discourse, headed by Rosa Berganza Conde, King Juan Carlos University Madrid.

The INFOCORE Dictionary includes…

  • 3,738 measured concepts in conflict-related discourse, ordered into four main groups: Semantic concepts (IDs 1####); Actors (2####); Times/Events (3####); Locations (4####)
  • 8 languages: Albanian, Arabic, English, French, German, Hebrew, Macedonian, and Serbian
  • 78,984 unique search phrases with 191,408 disambiguation criteria (Albanian: 9,595 + 22,915; Arabic: 9,592 + 10,816; English: 10,464 + 38,459; French: 7,476 + 19,470; German: 14,054 + 46,208; Hebrew: 11,708 + 14,853; Macedonian: 7,727 + 18,450; Serbian: 8,368 + 20,237)

The INFOCORE Dictionary is built for use in conjunction with the jamcode coding script available on Github, and the AmCAT open source text analysis platform.